Calibration/Validation Publications

2017
View
Guidelines for Calibrating, Validating, and Evaluating Hydrologic and Water Quality (H/WQ) Models (ASABE 621 JUN2017)

Developed by the NRES-21 Hydrology committee of ASABE.

2015
A continental-scale hydrology and water quality model for Europe: Calibration and uncertainty of a high-resolution large-scale SWAT model

Abbaspour, K.C., E. Rouholahnejad, S. Vaghefi, R. Srinivasan, H. Yang B. Kløve. 2015. A continental-scale hydrology and water quality model for Europe: Calibration and uncertainty of a high-resolution large-scale SWAT model. Journal of Hydrology. Vol. 524:733-752. DOI:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.03.027

View
Impact of model development, calibration and validation decisions on hydrological simulations in West Lake Erie Basin

Daggupati, P., H. Yen, M. J. White, R. Srinivasan, J. G. Arnold, C. S. Keitzer, S. P. Sowa. 2015. Impact of model development, calibration and validation decisions on hydrological simulations in West Lake Erie Basin. Hydrol. Process. (2015). DOI: 10.1002/hyp.10536

2014
View
Evaluating, interpreting, and communicating performance of hydrologic/water quality models considering intended use: A review and recommendations

Harmel, R.D., P.K. Smith, K.W. Migliaccio, I. Chaubey, K.R. Douglas-Mankin, B. Benham, S. Shukla, R. Muñoz-Carpena, B.J. Robson. 2014. Evaluating, interpreting, and communicating performance of hydrologic/water quality models considering intended use: A review and recommendations. Environmental Modelling & Software 57 (2014) 40-51.

2012
View
SWAT: Model Use, Calibration, and Validation

Arnold, J.G., D. N. Moriasi, P. W. Gassman, K. C. Abbaspour, M. J. White,R. Srinivasan, C. Santhi, R. D. Harmel, A. van Griensven, M. W. Van Liew, N. Kannan, M. K. Jha. 2012. SWAT: Model Use, Calibration, and Validation. Transactions of the ASABE. Vol. 55(4): 1491-1508.

View
Hydrologic and water quality models: use, calibration, and validation

Moriasi, D. N., B. N. Wilson, K. R. Douglas-Mankin, J. G. Arnold, P. H. Gowda. 2012. Hydrologic and water quality models: use, calibration, and validation. Transactions of the ASABE. Vol. 55(4): 1241-1247.

2009
View
On the use of multi-algorithm, genetically adaptive multi-objective method for multi-site calibration of the SWAT model

Zhang, X., R. Srinivasan, M. Van Liew. 2009. On the use of multi-algorithm, genetically adaptive multi-objective method for multi-site calibration of the SWAT model. Hydrol. Process. doi: 10.1002/hyp.7528

View
Calibration and uncertainty analysis of the SWAT model using Genetic Algorithms and Bayesian Model Averaging

Zhang, X., Srinivasan, R., Bosch, D., Calibration and uncertainty analysis of the SWAT model using Genetic Algorithms and Bayesian Model Averaging, Journal of Hydrology (2009), doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.06.023

2008
View
Evaluation of global optimization algorithms for parameter calibration of a computationally intensive hydrologic model

Zhang, X., R. Srinivasan, K. Zhao, M. Van Liew. 2008. Evaluation of global optimization algorithms for parameter calibration of a computationally intensive hydrologic model. Hydrol. Process. doi: 10.1002/hyp.7152

2007
View
Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations

Moriasi, D. N., J. G. Arnold, M. W. Van Liew, R. L. Bingner, R. D. Harmel, T. L. Veith. 2007. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Transactions of the ASABE. Vol. 50(3): 885-900.

View
Consideration of measurement uncertainty in the evaluation of goodness-of-fit in hydrologic and water quality modeling

Harmel, R. D., P.K. Smith. 2007. Consideration of measurement uncertainty in the evaluation of goodness-of-fit in hydrologic and water quality modeling. Journal of Hydrology. (2007) 337, 326-336.

2006
View
Cumulative uncertainty in measured streamflow and water quality data for small watersheds

Harmel, R. D., R. J. Cooper, R. M. Slade, R. L. Haney, J. G. Arnold. 2006. Cumulative uncertainty in measured streamflow and water quality data for small watersheds. Transactions of the ASABE. Vol. 49(3): 689-701.

2002
View
Comparison of two different approaches of sensitivity analysis

Lenhart, T., K. Eckhardt, N. Fohrer, H.G. Frede. 2002. Comparison of two different approaches of sensitivity analysis. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth. 27 (2002) 645–654.

1997
View
Usual planting and harvesting dates for U.S. field crops

1997. USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service.

1994
View
Optimal use of the SCE-UA global optimization method for calibrating watershed models

Duan, Q., S. Sorooshian, V. K. Gupta. 1994. Optimal use of the SCE-UA global optimization method for calibrating watershed models. Journal of Hydrology. 158 (1994) 265-284.

Unknown Year
View
SWAT calibration techniques

PowerPoint presentation.