Publications Calibration/Validation Publications

View
SWAT: Model Use, Calibration, and Validation

Arnold, J.G., D. N. Moriasi, P. W. Gassman, K. C. Abbaspour, M. J. White,R. Srinivasan, C. Santhi, R. D. Harmel, A. van Griensven, M. W. Van Liew, N. Kannan, M. K. Jha. 2012. SWAT: Model Use, Calibration, and Validation. Transactions of the ASABE. Vol. 55(4): 1491-1508.

View
Optimal use of the SCE-UA global optimization method for calibrating watershed models

Duan, Q., S. Sorooshian, V. K. Gupta. 1994. Optimal use of the SCE-UA global optimization method for calibrating watershed models. Journal of Hydrology. 158 (1994) 265-284.

View
Consideration of measurement uncertainty in the evaluation of goodness-of-fit in hydrologic and water quality modeling

Harmel, R. D., P.K. Smith. 2007. Consideration of measurement uncertainty in the evaluation of goodness-of-fit in hydrologic and water quality modeling. Journal of Hydrology. (2007) 337, 326-336.

View
Cumulative uncertainty in measured streamflow and water quality data for small watersheds

Harmel, R. D., R. J. Cooper, R. M. Slade, R. L. Haney, J. G. Arnold. 2006. Cumulative uncertainty in measured streamflow and water quality data for small watersheds. Transactions of the ASABE. Vol. 49(3): 689-701.

View
Evaluating, interpreting, and communicating performance of hydrologic/water quality models considering intended use: A review and recommendations

Harmel, R.D., P.K. Smith, K.W. Migliaccio, I. Chaubey, K.R. Douglas-Mankin, B. Benham, S. Shukla, R. Muñoz-Carpena, B.J. Robson. 2014. Evaluating, interpreting, and communicating performance of hydrologic/water quality models considering intended use: A review and recommendations. Environmental Modelling & Software 57 (2014) 40-51.

View
Comparison of two different approaches of sensitivity analysis

Lenhart, T., K. Eckhardt, N. Fohrer, H.G. Frede. 2002. Comparison of two different approaches of sensitivity analysis. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth. 27 (2002) 645–654.

View
Hydrologic and water quality models: use, calibration, and validation

Moriasi, D. N., B. N. Wilson, K. R. Douglas-Mankin, J. G. Arnold, P. H. Gowda. 2012. Hydrologic and water quality models: use, calibration, and validation. Transactions of the ASABE. Vol. 55(4): 1241-1247.

View
Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations

Moriasi, D. N., J. G. Arnold, M. W. Van Liew, R. L. Bingner, R. D. Harmel, T. L. Veith. 2007. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Transactions of the ASABE. Vol. 50(3): 885-900.

View
SWAT calibration techniques

PowerPoint presentation.

View
Usual planting and harvesting dates for U.S. field crops

1997. USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service.

View
Calibration and uncertainty analysis of the SWAT model using Genetic Algorithms and Bayesian Model Averaging

Zhang, X., Srinivasan, R., Bosch, D., Calibration and uncertainty analysis of the SWAT model using Genetic Algorithms and Bayesian Model Averaging, Journal of Hydrology (2009), doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.06.023

View
Evaluation of global optimization algorithms for parameter calibration of a computationally intensive hydrologic model

Zhang, X., R. Srinivasan, K. Zhao, M. Van Liew. 2008. Evaluation of global optimization algorithms for parameter calibration of a computationally intensive hydrologic model. Hydrol. Process. doi: 10.1002/hyp.7152

View
On the use of multi-algorithm, genetically adaptive multi-objective method for multi-site calibration of the SWAT model

Zhang, X., R. Srinivasan, M. Van Liew. 2009. On the use of multi-algorithm, genetically adaptive multi-objective method for multi-site calibration of the SWAT model. Hydrol. Process. doi: 10.1002/hyp.7528